Cliff Hirsch, Publisher, Semiconductor Times
An inside look at innovative semiconductor start-ups
The dearth of capital during the past two quarters is clearly noticeable,
with few new semiconductor companies forming, venture capitalists
protecting their strongest investments and weak companies dropping like
flies. In this helter-skelter environment, it's hard to spot the obvious home
runs. Yet, some trends are still evident.
For some time, there has been little room for traditional fabless startups
in the 40-nanometer digital domain. Design costs are simply too
high to make a reasonable return on investment. These days, most action
appears at the fringe of the industry rather than in the mainstream.
After eliminating the $5 billion sub 65-nanometer foundries and
their major league customers, what is left? Actually, quite a lot. There
are still many emerging innovations in the compound semiconductor
and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) arenas. Materials such as
Indium Phosphide and Gallium Nitride still have lots of runway, and
there are many companies pursing optical, power, lighting and radio
frequency (RF) products based on these materials.
From personal area network (PAN) to local area network (LAN) and
wide area network (WAN), there is always innovation in the RF arena
(both baseband and mixed-signal); however, most recent efforts are
focused on the front end as the cost of baseband development has become
prohibitive.
There have always been companies pursuing alternative memory
technologies to replace both dynamic random access memory (DRAM)
and Flash. Today, more than a handful of companies are making advances
and one was recently unveiled.
Unity Semiconductor was formed in 2002 to develop storage-class
non-volatile memory (NVM) products utilizing multi-layer memory
array architectures and a new memory cell technology called CMOx.
The company has raised more than $70 million to date and anticipates
seeking another $25 million in 2010.
Why do so many companies chase the memory market? Because it's
huge! Based on market research forecasts, Unity believes the total available
market (TAM) for its storage-class NVM products will be approximately
$15 billion in 2010 and grow to more than $25 billion in 2013.
Furthermore, Unity argues that the ability of NAND Flash technology
to scale is reaching its limits, creating an opening for new technologies
such as resistive random access memory (RRAM), ferroelectric RAM
(FeRAM), phase-change memory (PCM) and magnetoresistive random
access memory (MRAM).
In contrast to other emerging memory technologies, Unity argues that
only its CMOx technology has the small cell size to beat NAND Flash
in cost and density. Unity's objective is to have the smallest die size and
the lowest manufacturing cost-per-bit storage-class NVM products. The
company has filed an intellectual property (IP) portfolio that presently
includes 60 granted patents, with another 90 patent applications in
various stages of being granted.
Unity's technology is based on a passive cross-point, multi-layer
memory array and its CMOx memory cell, a technology that is based on
conductive metal oxide materials and the motion of ions. Unity's CMOx-based
design uses four physical layers of multi-level cell (MLC) memory
and is the key to increasing the density of its storage-class memory
products. CMOx will yield products with 4x the density and 5–10x the
write speed of today's NAND Flash.
Beyond technology innovation, Unity has also developed several
groundbreaking business concepts. Key among these is the separation of
front-end-of-line (FEOL) CMOS base wafer processing from back-end-of-line (BEOL) memory layer processing.
No new process technology is used in the CMOS base wafer, which
can be fabricated on a trailing-edge 90-nanometer CMOS process. The
CMOS FEOL strategy allows Unity to be a moderate follower in CMOS
transistor technology. Its shrink path is unconventional in that a higher
density memory core doesn't require base CMOS technology migration.
Instead, Unity can use the same 90-nanometer base CMOS process for
multiple generations, as well as use proven design IP to reduce risk and
time-to-market.
The finer pitch BEOL memory strategy calls for Unity to form a joint
venture partnership for volume manufacturing with a top-tier integrated
device manufacturer (IDM) already in the memory business.
Unity has been processing 64-kilobit devices for two years, a
64-megabit device for one year, and is in design of a 64-gigabit device
that is now close to tape-out and slated for pilot production in 2H 2010,
with volume production in 2Q 2011.
Unity's planned second-generation products are high-capacity,
high-performance 128-gigabit and 256-gigabit storage-class memories
with an interface, command set and features tuned for state-of-the-art
solid state devices (SSDs). The third generation will achieve the historic
milestone of single-chip 1-terabit storage-class memory. Unity expects to
build a 1-terabit storage-class memory product within five years using a
20-nanometer CMOx process technology.
Many alternative memory technologies have come and gone over
the years. Why has it been so hard for any to achieve success? Certainly,
the incumbent technologies are like steam rollers, flattening anything in
their path. The inability of today's memory technologies to scale into the
future, if this is truly insurmountable, may create an opening for new
emerging technologies, and Unity is well poised.
The other issue is that few emerging technologies ultimately deliver.
At the end of the day, they all have problems, whether it's cost, reliability,
performance or manufacturability. Whereas many companies appear to
have a singular focus on one technology, regardless of whether it's flawed
or not, Unity appears to have taken a pragmatic view of the market,
focusing on business and market issues as strongly as technology issues
as demonstrated by its separation of front-end and back-end wafer
processing. Based on this, I believe Unity's approach has much higher
odds of success than many other competing alternatives.
Darrell Rinerson, Founder, Chairman & CEO
L. David Sikes, President
Robin Cheung, VP, Process Engineering
Christophe Chevallier, VP, Design Engineering
David Eggleston, VP, Product Engineering & Strategic Marketing
Steve Hsia, VP, CMOS Technology
Wayne Kinney, VP, Device Technology
William Skolout, CFO
Morgan Malino, Chief Legal Counsel |
255 Santa Ana Court
Sunnyvale, California 94085
USA
(T) 408-737-7200
(F) 408-737-8067
(W) www.unitysemi.com
|
 |
Cliff Hirsch (cliff@pinestream.com) is the publisher of Semiconductor Times, an industry newsletter focusing on semiconductor start-ups and their latest technology. For information on this publication, visit www.pinestream.com. |